Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Bases and Clinics in General Surgery ; (12)2003.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-538500

ABSTRACT

Objective To discuss the effective surgical treatment of intrahepatic lithiasis combined with high hepa-t ic duct strictures. Methods Two hundreds and sixteen cases of intra hepatic lithiasis and high hepatic duct strictures treated in this hospital fr om January 1993 to October 2002 were analysed retrospectively.Results One hundred and eighty- three cases underwent different selective operation by selected time; 33 case s complicated with acute obstructive suppurative cholangitis underwent emergency were performed single biliary drainage, in which 30 cases were re-operated. Th e operative procedure were: hepatic lobectomy,high cholangiotomy and plastic repair,exposure of hepatic duct of the 2nd and the 3rd order,and plastic re pair with own patch and choledochojejunostomy.Two hundreds and six cases w ere cured,the curative rate was 95.4%; 8 cases improved (3.7 %), and 2 cases died (0.9%).Conclusion The best effective surgical treat ment of intrahpatic lithiasis is hepatic lobectomy. Exposure of hepatic duct of the 2nd and the 3rd order is a satisfactory to release the hepatic duct str ictures and to clear the intrahepatic lithiasis. For patients with normal extr ahepatic bile duct and Oddi's function, plastic repair of bile duct with own patch is possible to keep the normal form and function. Cholang ioscopy may play an important role in the treatment of intrahepatic tr act lithiasis during operation.

2.
Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery ; (12)2001.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-583334

ABSTRACT

Objective To discuss the feasibility of stone removal in laparoscopic choledocholithotomy by routine laparotomic instruments. Methods A total of 73 patients with common bile duct stones were divided randomly into 2 groups: the Experimental Group received laparoscopic stone removal by routine laparotomic instruments; the Control Group received stone removal by choledochoscopic net-basket. The stone-free rate, operative time, total hospitalization costs and postoperative complications between the two groups were compared. Results There were no statistical significances in stone-free rate between the Experimental Group ( 94.4% , 34/36) and the Control Group (94.6%, 35/37) ( ? 2=0.000, P =1.000). The operative time in the Experimental Group (150.9 min?26.8 min) was shorter than that in the Control Group (172.3 min?28.6 min) ( t=3.297, P =0.002), whereas the total hospitalization costs in the Experimental Group (4400 yuan?1100 yuan) was lower than that in the Control Group (5000 yuan?1300 yuan) ( t=2.126, P= 0.037). No severe operation-related complications were observed in both of the groups. Conclusions Laparoscopic choledocholithotomy by either routine laparotomic instruments or choledochoscopy is safe and effective. Stone removal by routine laparotomic instruments has the advantages of low costs and short operative time.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL